Mirador estimate
    $5,000/month

    Oakmont of East Sacramento

    5301 F St, Sacramento, CA, 95819
    4.4 · 71 reviews
    • Independent living
    • Assisted living
    • Memory care

    Pricing

    $5,000+/moSuiteAssisted Living

    Schedule a Tour

    Amenities

    Healthcare services

    • Activities of daily living assistance
    • Assistance with bathing
    • Assistance with dressing
    • Assistance with transfers
    • Coordination with health care providers
    • Hospice waiver
    • Medication management
    • Mental wellness program

    Healthcare staffing

    • 12-16 hour nursing
    • 24-hour call system
    • 24-hour supervision

    Meals and dining

    • Diabetes diet
    • Meal preparation and service
    • Restaurant-style dining
    • Special dietary restrictions

    Room

    • Air-conditioning
    • Cable
    • Fully furnished
    • Housekeeping and linen services
    • Kitchenettes
    • Private bathrooms
    • Spa
    • Telephone
    • Wifi

    Memory care community services

    • Dementia waiver
    • Mild cognitive impairment
    • Specialized memory care programming

    Transportation

    • Community operated transportation
    • Transportation arrangement
    • Transportation arrangement (medical)
    • Transportation arrangement (non-medical)
    • Transportation to doctors appointments

    Common areas

    • Beauty salon
    • Computer center
    • Dining room
    • Fitness room
    • Gaming room
    • Garden
    • Outdoor space
    • Pet friendly
    • Small library
    • Wellness center

    Community services

    • Concierge services
    • Fitness programs
    • Move-in coordination

    Activities

    • Community-sponsored activities
    • Planned day trips
    • Resident-run activities
    • Scheduled daily activities

    4.41 · 71 reviews

    Overall rating

    1. 5
    2. 4
    3. 3
    4. 2
    5. 1
    • Care

      4.1
    • Staff

      4.2
    • Meals

      4.2
    • Amenities

      4.6
    • Value

      2.3

    Location

    Map showing location of Oakmont of East Sacramento

    About Oakmont of East Sacramento

    Oakmont of East Sacramento sits in East Sacramento, California, and offers a wide range of senior living options, including independent living, assisted living, memory care, skilled nursing, and home care. The property's pleasant grounds feature gardens and views, and you'll see a variety of spaces to enjoy, like quiet walking paths, outdoor seating, and indoor common areas. Residents have access to private apartment homes with kitchenettes, WiFi, cable, and nice furnishings. The dining areas look comfortable, and award-winning chefs prepare meals. Meals come with several choices, including vegetarian and diets for health conditions like diabetes or kidney disease. The community makes sure residents get help with things like bathing, dressing, and medication, and there's a skilled nursing team with nurses on site all day and night.

    For memory care, Oakmont provides secure areas and creates individualized care plans for people living with dementia or Alzheimer's. There are activities and therapies meant to help keep the mind active and offer a sense of purpose, with specially trained staff. Assisted living residents get support as needed and still keep as much independence as possible, with friendly staff available to help out. The grounds have spaces for relaxing, socializing, and recreation, including a salon, aquatic center with a hot tub, fitness programs, a movie theater, computers, and walking or hiking areas. Community activities range from games and crafts to devotional services, outings, and gardening, aiming to keep everyone active and connected.

    Oakmont's location lets residents and visitors walk to shops, fine dining, entertainment, and the arts nearby, which makes outings easier. The community's wellness center supports health needs, along with pharmacy and health reminders. Housekeeping and laundry are available. Support services include resources for family caregivers and insurance guidance, and there are online tools like a blog and FAQs. Onsite parking and a gated entrance help with safety and access. The staff often gets described as kind and helpful, and the facility is verified for licensing and compliance (state license number 342701121). The rating is currently 3.2 based on nine reviews, reflecting a mix of experiences. Oakmont of East Sacramento aims to provide various living options matching different care levels, from active, independent lifestyles to those needing more daily help or nursing support, all while giving residents choices for dining, recreation, and social time.

    People often ask...

    State of California Inspection Reports

    83

    Inspections

    14

    Type A Citations

    16

    Type B Citations

    5

    Years of reports

    22 Apr 2025
    Found overall compliance with health and safety standards at the site, with resident and staff records complete. One resident room had a strong urine odor and the resident was temporarily relocated while maintenance shampooed the carpet.
    • § 9058
    14 Feb 2025
    Investigated the Financial Issues allegation and found no evidence to support it after reviewing three months of utility bills, staffing levels, and food supplies; observed the home to be clean, well maintained, and in compliance with regulations.
    14 Jan 2025
    Investigated allegations that staff did not keep the site free from bug infestation and did not ensure a resident had sufficient clothing. Findings showed bed bugs were treated promptly after discovery, additional treatment occurred for a later finding, and clothing and hygiene items were purchased for residents when needed; interviews indicated residents had clothing at transfer.
    30 Aug 2024
    Identified on 8/30/21 at 1:30 pm that a staff member showed a larger syringe disposal container capable of holding more syringes and reducing risk to staff.
    30 Aug 2024
    Inspection confirmed correction of previous deficiencies related to syringe disposal.
    23 Jul 2024
    Found that the allegation that staff did not safeguard a resident’s personal belongings was unfounded, and that the allegation that staff did not assist with feeding or meet the resident’s needs was unfounded.
    22 Aug 2024
    Identified two overfilled needle disposal containers not compliant with bloodborne pathogen rules. Observed overall safety and care standards, including water at 113°F, sufficient food supplies, current fire safety equipment and detectors, carbon monoxide detectors, a complete first aid kit, and securely stored medications, but one resident with dementia did not have a current physician's report (last dated February 2023).
    22 Aug 2024
    Identified deficiencies in safety protocols and documentation during inspection.
    • § 87705(c)(6)
    • § 87303(f)(2)
    23 Jul 2024
    Investigated three allegations: staff did not assist a resident with showers; staff did not ensure the resident's blood glucose testing equipment worked; and staff did not ensure timely medication reorders. Found them unsubstantiated.
    23 Jul 2024
    Found insufficient evidence to prove the allegation that a resident was not prevented from making inappropriate comments to other residents. Interviews with residents and staff did not reveal any such incidents.
    23 Jul 2024
    Reviewed records show a resident did not receive prescribed Megestrol Acetate for 12 days in June and was diagnosed with an unstageable wound on 06/20/2024, with hospital evaluation on 06/21/2024. Found that this incident was reported to the department later than required, indicating reporting requirements were not followed.
    • § 87211(a)(1)
    • § 87465(a)(4)
    23 Jul 2024
    Found delays in responding to call pendants and inconsistent monitoring of oxygen needs. Documented records showed several responses exceeded 15 minutes.
    • § 87303(i)(1)
    23 Jul 2024
    Identified deficiencies in medication administration and reporting requirements during a visit by Licensing Program Analysts.
    24 Apr 2024
    Found no deficiencies identified during the visit. Observed clean, well-maintained premises with adequate food supplies, secured medications, functioning safety systems, and complete resident and staff files; noted one resident room with a strong urine odor.
    24 Apr 2024
    Inspection found the facility to be in compliance with regulations, with all areas inspected meeting health and safety standards.
    20 Mar 2024
    Addressed concerns from a separate complaint investigation. Interviews and a file review were conducted; case management will continue at a later date; no deficiencies cited.
    20 Mar 2024
    Found neglect due to lack of supervision and failure to meet reporting requirements after a resident experienced multiple falls and staff did not contact emergency contacts.
    • § 87465(a)(1)
    • § 87303(i)(1)
    • § 87468.1(a)(8)
    20 Mar 2024
    Conducted an inspection, no deficiencies cited.
    16 Nov 2023
    Found that the administrator did not ensure written responses within 14 days to family council concerns raised on 9/9/2023 and 10/10/2023. A verbal response was provided on 11/14/2023, and calls and emails were sent to the administrator and the VP of Operations.
    • § 1569.158(f)
    16 Nov 2023
    Identified an allegation that a deficiency was not corrected by its due date, with penalties assessed for the delay. Later documentation showed the deficiency was cleared.
    16 Nov 2023
    Confirmed deficiency cited during the prior inspection has been corrected.
    24 Oct 2023
    Found staff did not respond to residents' call bells in a timely manner, with several instances of calls not answered within 15 minutes.
    24 Oct 2023
    Found that staff did not respond promptly to residents' call bells.
    • § 87303(i)(1)
    19 Oct 2023
    Found no evidence to support the allegation that staff failed to provide a resident with a copy of financial statements. Found no evidence to support the allegation that staff did not adequately keep records of a resident's expenses.
    19 Oct 2023
    Confirmed allegations related to financial statement delivery and record keeping, while others were not supported by evidence.
    • § 1569.88(b)
    12 Oct 2023
    Found no deficiencies; observed clean, well-maintained spaces with adequate lighting, water at 113°F, sufficient food supplies, current fire extinguishers and smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors present, a complete first aid kit, and medications securely stored.
    12 Oct 2023
    Confirmed the facility met all required regulations during the annual inspection.
    22 Sept 2023
    Determined that four residents had credit cards stolen and used without authorization, with local police arresting a staff member after the site reported the incidents and followed its theft-loss policy. Noted that mandated reporting was not fully completed, specifically failing to submit a suspected dependent adult/elder abuse report to the ombudsperson within two working days.
    22 Sept 2023
    Confirmed theft of credit cards and unauthorized use, reporting requirements not met.
    • § 87405(d)(2)
    • § 87468.2(a)(8)
    05 Sept 2023
    Found that an elevator was out of service starting August 1, 2023 and repaired on August 11, 2023 after a replacement part shipment delay, with meals and transportation provided to residents during the outage; there is not enough evidence to prove the specific allegation either way.
    05 Sept 2023
    Determined elevator issue was addressed promptly and meal tray service and transportation assistance were provided.
    25 Jul 2023
    Determined the questionable death allegation could not be proven and the personal rights allegation was not supported. Emergency responders were contacted and no deficiencies were found.
    25 Jul 2023
    Reviewed the allegations of a suspicious death and the failure to contact emergency services, but insufficient evidence found to support these claims. Confirmed that emergency services were contacted after the resident experienced a seizure, but another episode occurred leading to the resident's death, and the resident had a do-not-resuscitate order in place.
    10 May 2023
    Identified that a monthly pet care fee was charged at admission and later credited after reevaluation when it was no longer needed. Found not enough evidence to prove a personal rights issue related to showering assistance or an allergy concern.
    10 May 2023
    Determined no evidence of personal rights violations regarding resident's shower assistance, and meal allergens were handled per physician's directions. Confirmed incorrect pet fee charge had been applied and credited back after evaluation.
    • § 87507(g)(3)
    23 Feb 2023
    Found the site clean, safe, and well maintained, with correct water temperature, sufficient food supplies, functioning detectors and fire safety equipment, and complete resident and staff files; no deficiencies noted.
    23 Feb 2023
    Inspection found no deficiencies, all areas of the facility were in compliance with regulations.
    13 Jan 2023
    Investigated the allegation that staff did not meet with the responsible party for a reappraisal; found the healthcare POA attended the 12/15/22 meeting, not the complainant. Investigated the allegations that staff do not shower the resident and that dietary needs were not met; found the resident showers twice weekly with refusals documented, and the diet is diabetic-appropriate with three snacks daily, with dietary restrictions kept in a binder.
    13 Jan 2023
    Confirmed that the allegations of staff not meeting with responsible party for a meeting and not showering a resident were unfounded, while the allegation of staff not meeting the resident's dietary needs was unsubstantiated.
    29 Dec 2022
    Investigated the allegation that staff did not seek medical attention for a resident; found staff were never told the resident had chest pain, and chart notes only showed shoulder pain with a PRN medication given. Determined there was not enough evidence to prove or disprove the allegation.
    29 Dec 2022
    Determined the allegation that staff did not provide adequate food service for resident(s) is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
    29 Dec 2022
    Allegation of inadequate food service for a resident was investigated, but there was not enough evidence to confirm or dismiss the claim.
    09 Dec 2022
    Found a coded egress exit not accessible to residents to prevent elopement; staffing was adequate with recent hires; a staff member spoke inappropriately to residents and action was taken; hazardous items were not accessible to residents; and dietary needs were being met.
    09 Dec 2022
    Allegation of memory care resident eloping is unsubstantiated. Staffing levels have been increased to meet residents' needs. Inappropriate behavior by staff member has been addressed. Environmental hazards are not accessible to residents and special dietary needs are being met.
    • § 87468.1(a)(1)
    29 Nov 2022
    Found that the allegation of a non-functioning call system was unfounded; testing showed the call buttons worked and staff responded promptly. Found that the allegation that staff did not follow up with the resident’s physician after emergency treatment was unfounded; staff were checking on the resident regularly and adjusted monitoring to avoid annoyance.
    29 Nov 2022
    Confirmed that the call system was functioning and staff responded appropriately. Also determined that staff made adjustments to check on the resident without causing annoyance.
    19 Oct 2022
    Found that the resident’s death was not caused by a UTI, with redness and a skin opening noted before hospital transfer; could not determine if injuries occurred from unwitnessed falls. Identified recurrent UTIs, concerns about following a diabetic diet due to staffing shortages, observed double diapering, attempts to obtain urine samples and coordinate testing with the doctor, information about medications given to family, and that a wheelchair was safeguarded.
    19 Oct 2022
    Reviewed multiple allegations of resident care and found that some were not supported by evidence, while others were proven to be accurate and resulted in citations.
    23 Sept 2022
    Found no deficiencies observed; safety measures, temperature, hot water, and equipment were in good order, with medications secured and one resident receiving hospice care. Identified annual submissions including designation of responsibility, liability insurance, updated administrator certificate, and personnel report; exit interview conducted.
    23 Sept 2022
    Inspection found no deficiencies at the facility and all required items were in compliance with regulations.
    26 Jul 2022
    Determined unfounded that staff allowed a resident to give medications to another resident; the involved resident never took any medications. Determined unfounded that staff allowed another resident to open the resident’s mail, bathe the resident, change the catheter, or help dress the resident.
    26 Jul 2022
    Found allegations of residents improperly handling medications, mail, bathing, catheter care, and dressing each other were unfounded, with evidence showing residents were independent and capable, or that the scenarios described did not occur.
    21 Jul 2022
    Found no convincing evidence to support the allegation of neglect resulting in malnutrition, dehydration, or pneumonia, and found no reasonable basis for the allegation of a questionable death. Found no convincing evidence to prove the allegations that timely medical attention was not sought, medications were not administered as prescribed, requests for communication were not responded to, a higher level of care needs resident was retained, or staffing was insufficient; civil penalty action related to a serious injury was pending.
    21 Jul 2022
    Found allegations of failure to observe a resident's care needs, questionable death, delayed medical attention, medication administration issues, and lack of staff were unsubstantiated, but serious bodily injury violations were confirmed.
    • § 87625(b)(2)
    • § 87555(b)(7)
    28 Apr 2022
    Found that staff assisted with changing the resident when they did not refuse, tried different times, used calming methods, and called the responsible party when needed. There was insufficient evidence to prove the allegation that staff did not assist with incontinence needs.
    28 Apr 2022
    Determined that staff attempted to assist resident with incontinence needs but were unsuccessful, resulting in the responsible party being contacted for assistance.
    • § 87465(j)
    29 Mar 2022
    Found no deficiencies; safety devices current, temperatures within the required range, medications and cleaning supplies secured, and food supplies adequate.
    29 Mar 2022
    Conducted an inspection. No deficiencies observed.
    14 Mar 2022
    Found that during an unannounced case management visit, updates indicated a conservatorship hearing was scheduled and medical staff supported placement for the resident. The resident had not been moved and was eating dinner during the visit, a risk assessment before entry showed no active COVID-19 cases; deficiencies were cited and appeal rights were provided with an exit interview conducted.
    • § 87468.1(a)(6)
    14 Mar 2022
    Confirmed deficiencies in care and management were observed during the visit to follow up on a previous complaint.
    • § 87468.1(a)(6)
    17 Feb 2022
    Investigated a resident-related complaint via an unannounced case-management visit and found no deficiencies observed under applicable rules. Pursued follow-up with external agencies and the resident's legal representatives, with updates anticipated.
    17 Feb 2022
    Found no deficiencies. The front fire hydrant was not functioning, delaying approval; repairs were underway and the fire inspector would approve once fixed.
    17 Feb 2022
    Confirmed no deficiencies during the inspection, fire safety issue being addressed.
    19 Jan 2022
    Identified that the allegation that a resident was not allowed to leave was supported by records showing the resident had a health care and financial power of attorney, not a conservator. The resident signed a voluntary entry statement for a locked perimeter and stated a wish to go home.
    • § 87468.1(a)(6)
    • § 1569.698(f)
    19 Jan 2022
    Found that a resident with only a Power of Attorney for healthcare and finances expressed a desire to leave, but was not allowed to do so, in violation of applicable regulations.
    01 Dec 2021
    Identified that the resident's responsible person was not notified about two falls. The other four concerns—staff not following the care plan, injuries from falls, being left in a soiled diaper, and removal of a pendant—lacked sufficient evidence to support them.
    01 Dec 2021
    Confirmed allegations of staff not following resident's care plan and resident sustaining injuries while in care. Unsubstantiated allegations of resident's responsible person not being notified of incidents and resident being left in a soiled diaper for an extended period.
    07 Oct 2021
    Found no deficiencies during the 10/07/2021 visit; observed compliance with health and safety protocols, including entry screening, COVID-19 precautions, hand sanitizer, posted notices, and six-foot spacing in common areas, with 133 residents and 2 on hospice.
    07 Oct 2021
    Confirmed no deficiencies during inspection visit.
    • § 87211(a)(1)
    04 Oct 2021
    Found no deficiencies after an unannounced annual visit on 10/04/2021; licensed for 214 non-ambulatory residents with a hospice waiver for 8, and 133 residents currently reside there (including 2 on hospice). Observed a central screening entry, an approved mitigation plan, a designated outdoor visiting area, COVID-19 postings, hand sanitizer throughout, and sanitary, furnished common areas; a follow-up visit to review memory care was scheduled.
    04 Oct 2021
    Inspection found the facility to be in compliance with regulations and no deficiencies were observed during the visit.
    10 Sept 2021
    Found no deficiencies after an unannounced visit and file review. Safety measures were in place, temperatures and hot water met required ranges, medications were securely stored, and the standard annual documents were identified for submission.
    10 Sept 2021
    Found no deficiencies during the visit.
    22 Jul 2021
    Identified that a homeless person climbed in through an open window and that another homeless person attempted to break in. Found that residents were satisfied with laundry and meals, and there was no evidence that staff did not check on residents in a timely manner.
    22 Jul 2021
    Confirmed that a homeless person entered the facility through an open window, but residents are satisfied with the care provided.
    19 Apr 2021
    Identified concerns that resident rooms were dirty, laundry was not being done, and safety accommodations were inadequate; requested the police report on break-in incidents.
    19 Apr 2021
    Confirmed concerns about cleanliness, laundry services, and accommodation safety at the facility during the televisit inspection.
    • § 80072(a)(2)
    19 Feb 2021
    Identified that a resident was relocated to a rehabilitation center without notice or consent from the responsible party, with the bed not held for return and instead filled by another resident, an illegal eviction. Found the preplacement appraisal incomplete and observed a resident in a common area holding a box of Advil.
    • §
    • § 85068.3(b)(3)
    • §
    19 Feb 2021
    Reviewed records and interviews found that a resident fell on 1/8/2020 resulting in a fracture and that medical attention was not sought promptly. Found no evidence of bedsores or pressure injuries, and there was insufficient evidence to confirm issues with medication administration at this home.
    19 Feb 2021
    Confirmed serious injury due to failure to seek timely medical attention following a resident's fall, but unsubstantiated claims of pressure injuries and inadequate food assistance were not supported.
    • § 87465
    30 Sept 2020
    Found substantial compliance with minimum requirements for a RCFE license; medications stored securely, fire safety measures in place, and seven days of non-perishable plus two days of perishable foods stocked for shelter-in-place. Capacity identified for 213 non-ambulatory residents (up to eight bedridden); memory care area clean, safe, and secured; fire clearance obtained.
    30 Sept 2020
    Confirmed substantial compliance with licensing requirements during the inspection.
    • § 87211
    09 Apr 2020
    Confirmed understanding of various regulations and policies during the inspection.

    Nearby Communities

    • Front exterior view of a senior living facility named 'the Chateau' with a covered entrance, surrounded by lush green trees and landscaped flower beds. There are chairs and an American flag near the entrance.
      $4,400 – $9,155+4.2 (90)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      River's Edge

      601 Feature Dr, Sacramento, CA, 95825
    • Exterior view of a senior living facility named Oakmont of Carmichael with a beige stucco building, tiled roof, landscaped garden with colorful flowers, trees, and a curved walkway. Two people are walking on the path near the entrance.
      $3,795 – $5,495+4.6 (121)
      Studio • Semi-private
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Oakmont of Carmichael

      4717 Engle Rd, Carmichael, CA, 95608
    • Exterior view of Oakmont of Westpark senior living facility at dusk, showing a two-story building with illuminated windows, stone and stucco facade, landscaped greenery, and a covered entrance with a clearance sign.
      $3,595 – $4,995+4.3 (86)
      Studio • Semi-private
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Oakmont of Westpark

      2400 Pleasant Grove Blvd, Roseville, CA, 95747
    • Photo of Oakmont of Fair Oaks
      $3,995 – $6,595+4.4 (87)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • Semi-private
      assisted living, memory care

      Oakmont of Fair Oaks

      8484 Madison Ave, Fair Oaks, CA, 95628
    • Exterior view of Ivy Park at Roseville, a multi-story senior living facility with beige and brown stucco walls and red tile roofing. The entrance features a covered drop-off area with benches and potted plants. There is a landscaped roundabout with flowers and shrubs, and an American flag flying on a flagpole. The sky is clear and blue.
      $3,000 – $3,900+4.2 (62)
      Semi-private • 1 Bedroom • Studio
      independent living, assisted living, board and care

      Ivy Park at Roseville

      5161 Foothills Blvd, Roseville, CA, 95747
    • Exterior view of a three-story senior living facility building with beige walls and multiple balconies. The building is surrounded by green grass, trees, and shrubs under a clear blue sky.
      $2,865 – $4,785+4.6 (69)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      independent living

      Truewood by Merrill, Roseville

      1275 Pleasant Grove Boulevard, Roseville, CA, 95747

    Assisted Living in Nearby Cities

    253 facilities$4,756/mo
    251 facilities$4,822/mo
    335 facilities$4,896/mo
    263 facilities$4,935/mo
    260 facilities$4,783/mo
    299 facilities$4,889/mo
    263 facilities$4,981/mo
    258 facilities$5,022/mo
    350 facilities$4,835/mo
    128 facilities$4,326/mo
    161 facilities$4,849/mo
    389 facilities$4,836/mo
    © 2025 Mirador Living