Premier Estates of Oxford is a nursing care facility situated in Oxford, Ohio, serving a community with a population of over twenty-seven thousand residents. The facility operates with an estimated occupancy of approximately sixty percent. Although historical data suggest that its overall quality ratings have room for improvement, the home demonstrates particular strengths and weaknesses across various aspects of care.
In recent inspection reports, Premier Estates of Oxford received favorable marks when it came to meeting state inspection standards. Notably, while some deficiencies were recorded, none were categorized as severe according to relevant deficiency scales. This suggests that, in terms of regulatory oversight, the environment maintains a generally safe standard for residents, even if some minor issues were identified.
Nursing care at Premier Estates of Oxford is measured by the amount of hands-on support provided to residents each day. The reported figures indicate that the nursing staff provides an average of just 0.3 hours of nursing care per resident each day, a number that falls below national averages. However, the home demonstrated some positive outcomes in clinical quality measures, with particularly low rates of pressure ulcers and serious falls among residents. There were no reported urinary tract infections among long-term patients, which is often an indicator of good infection prevention practices.
When examining the use of medications, about 21 percent of residents at the home received antipsychotic drugs, and roughly 34 percent used antianxiety medications. Additionally, over sixty-two percent of residents were noted to display symptoms of depression. The vaccination rates for influenza and pneumonia were slightly below average, standing at just over ninety percent for long-term residents. Functional mobility and independence measures showed that approximately twelve percent of the residents retained their mobility over time, and a similar percentage needed extra assistance with daily activities as time went on.
Short-term rehabilitation care presented a mixed picture. The home provided fewer hours of licensed nursing and physical therapy than many similar facilities, and there were no documented cases of residents being able to return home after their stays, which trails the national averages in this area. On the other hand, all recorded short-term residents experienced some level of functional improvement during their stay, and the facility achieved a notably low rate of hospitalizations among its long-term residents.
Long-term care at Premier Estates of Oxford received lower comparative ratings, suggesting that around-the-clock support and ongoing health monitoring may not be as robust as in some other locations. Vaccination rates and preventative strategies were slightly below the goals seen elsewhere. Nevertheless, the facility did achieve certain successes in minimizing hospitalizations and preventing pressure ulcers and serious falls, which are important measures of ongoing resident health.
Overall, while Premier Estates of Oxford has demonstrated strengths in several areas of resident safety and some clinical outcomes, it faces challenges related to the levels of nursing support, rehabilitation success, and the continuity of long-term care. The facility’s track record highlights the importance of considering all aspects of care provision, from daily clinical routines to longer-term support services, when evaluating a nursing home environment.